-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make usage documentation consistent and also demoose #371
Conversation
5a1f39d
to
4499769
Compare
I guess |
a813fd4
to
e56eec4
Compare
I've split out #381 from this PR and rebased this one on top of that one. |
The man page starts with
The easier and preferred format is
|
|
I think |
|
As I state in the PR description I'm deferring all improvements to the text. If you look at #389 you'll see that I update the SYNOPSIS section so that it declares the command line syntax instead of just a selection of examples. |
@mattias-p, please look at issue #388. I think you are behind that code. |
@matsduf As you discovered I had forgotten to implement the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me.
Release testing for 2024.2: I have some remarks, but there are no show-stoppers. What works:
But there are some things worth looking at:
|
@marc-vanderwal wrote:
My comment: I guess it would make sense to combine |
@marc-vanderwal, will you create an issue or a PR of your findings? |
Yes, I agree that it makes sense; you just end up dumping the profile from
I’ve created issue #403. |
Not necessarily. File could contains just one property, e.g.
Great. |
Purpose
This PR kills two birds with one stone:
Context
Changes
Application:
Tests:
Documentation:
Reviewing this PR
Testing this PR