-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 533
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[REVIEW] Single-linkage Hierarchical Clustering C++ #3545
Conversation
Conflicts: cpp/src_prims/sparse/coo.cuh
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pre-approving, very minor feedback
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One minor request
rerun tests |
@gpucibot merge |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## branch-0.19 #3545 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 80.72% 45.27% -35.46%
================================================
Files 228 224 -4
Lines 17629 17059 -570
================================================
- Hits 14231 7723 -6508
- Misses 3398 9336 +5938
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
rerun tests |
@cjnolet I think the logs are showing an error in the doxygen docstring: /var/lib/jenkins/workspa/var/lib/jenkins/workspace/rapidsai/gpuci/cuml/prb/cuml-gpu-test/CUDA/10.2/GPU_LABEL/gpu/OS/centos7/PYTHON/3.8/cpp/include/cuml/cluster/linkage.hpp:79: error: unbalanced grouping commands (warning treated as error, aborting now)
|
Closes #3518
I've closed the original PR (#3308) which included both SLHC & HDBSCAN and opened this PR to only include the SLHC changes.
This PR contains an implementation of SLHC which is currently broken across RAFT & cuML. Once we move the dense pairwise distance primitive over to RAFT the entire SLHC algorithm can live in RAFT so it can be shared w/ cugraph, and will just be exposed through cuml.
If reviewing this PR, please also review the corresponding RAFT PR: rapidsai/raft#140