-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Suggestion: Multiple separate iteration values and different tiled outputs #4
Comments
That worth a shot |
@0000sir If you see the provided output, you can see the different tiles are extremely visible. With a lower iteration count, this issue could be lessened, or even non-existent. I went for 250 iterations on each tile, but your script only saves the final output current. The work for iteration 50, 100, 150, 200, etc... was done either way, and when I did what the script does manually, I saved these other iterations along the way in case the tiles diverged too much by my target iteration count. I am not sure how to properly make the script work with the -save_iter command, but this is something that would allow for dealing with poor U-press iteration choices. |
So, by adding the |
save different iter_value results to different directory should be a easier way. |
The number of iterations used for the upres tiling should be an independent value of the original output's number of iterations. In practice I have found that high iteration counts work well for the original output, while a lower iteration counts work well for the upres tiling. It would be ideal to divide the tiling into 4 separate folders, for iteration 50, 150, 250, and 500 (or whatever values you want). Each of these folders should be used to create their own tiled image output. I find this works best to choose between multiple outputs, because of the unpredictability caused by upres. This is how I normally do things manually, and it doesn't cost extra time or resources due to the fact these iterations are done anyway while the neural network works towards your iteration value.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: