-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 314
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Understanding ElasticPress #787
Comments
Some additional info: I thought I'd found the issue > I was using 2 different domains to access the two Wordpress servers and therefore changes applied on server #2 are saved on the elastic search server under a new index based on the domain. Hopefully in a LIVE environment where servers share the same domain this would not be an issue, however, I wanted to test updating a record directly on the ElasticSearch stored data to see if that was reflected on the website. Unfortunately it doesn't. Is this because Wordpress is still taking the data from the Database (I noticed you still need to maintain a local DB and records are stored there also even with ElasicPress running) -OR- is this a caching issue? Does ElasticPress "just" use ElasticSearch as a data backup facility? Thanks. |
@lswale I'm not getting how is your server configured. With that setup you can setup better autoscaling. |
@ivankristianto |
@lswale |
I am new to both ElasticSearch and ElasticPress. I would like to use both in conjunction with Wordpress and AWS S3 (using WP plugin "WP Offload S3") to move any dynamic content away from the local server allowing for auto-scaling using AWS images that contain only the core WP files.
My theory was to create a base image which could be used to spawn new instances using auto-scaling but any changes would be reflected in the new instances as WP is now using S3 and ElasticSearch. I have tested this by creating 2 servers both running the same configuration (ElasticPress and S3) and then making a small modification on one of the severs. I was hoping, as the changes are not made locally (or so I thought) that the 2nd server would reflect the changes. Is my theory incorrect? Your input welcome here. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: