-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Automatically test if a given image will start after building #2561
Comments
I'd argue we should zoom out on this a little and have a larger effort focused on what should image management/workflow look like. From a community perspective there are probably lots of clear use cases we can build. So the build/deploy/test cycle can be completely managed by communities and they get sufficient feedback to address issues. From a personal perspective I think that a product focused approach to image management should remove the need for SRE /support requests around image as a larger product goal. |
+1000
+1000 |
I opened 2i2c-org/features#26 for an incremental change towards that. |
We have had to do a couple of reverts (#2560 and #2551) where an image that was successfully built with repo2docker-action does not actually start on a JupyterHub. This should be automatically tested so that it is caught earlier, and handled by the folks changing the images and not 2i2c engineers.
jupyterhub/repo2docker-action#103 is upstream issue I just filed related to this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: