Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cost Explorer API (7/n): come up with strategy on how to account costs in openscapes and new AWS clusters respectively #4712

Closed
Tracked by #4453
consideRatio opened this issue Aug 28, 2024 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@consideRatio
Copy link
Contributor

consideRatio commented Aug 28, 2024

I've discussed with Yuvi about 2i2c:hub-name tag not capturing much costs (~30 USD / month out of ~1k) in a Erik/Yuvi 1on1. For a new hub setup where we think we have all AWS resources tagged with wanted tags (#4711), we can have one strategy on providing a graph, but the strategy we provide for openscapes must be adjusted as we don't have all relevant tags there.

Yuvi's guidance was that we are to proceed with solving this for openscapes as well as for new hubs, where openscapes may need additional patch work.

Definition of done

  • A strategy on how to account such costs for openscapes is provided
    - A strategy on how to account such costs for future very thoroughly tagged hubs is provided
@consideRatio consideRatio self-assigned this Aug 28, 2024
@consideRatio consideRatio changed the title aws billing: overview most costs from 2i2c infra, figure out how to isolate them in openscapes specifically, and then also how we would identify them in new projects Cost Explorer API (7/n): come up with strategy on how to account costs in openscapes and new AWS hubs respectively Aug 28, 2024
@consideRatio consideRatio changed the title Cost Explorer API (7/n): come up with strategy on how to account costs in openscapes and new AWS hubs respectively Cost Explorer API (7/n): come up with strategy on how to account costs in openscapes and new AWS clusters respectively Aug 28, 2024
@haroldcampbell
Copy link

Moving the "A strategy on how to account such costs for future very thoroughly tagged hubs is provided" goal to a separate issue.

@consideRatio
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've ended up also doing the removed goal, the strategies for openscapes and future clusters aligned well enough with some tweaks that I simply felt it was too much wasted time not to think of the future already.

@consideRatio
Copy link
Contributor Author

With #4453 (comment), I consider this completed!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants