You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I have recently been using Model-Angelo to identify an unknown density determined by cryo-EM with a local resolution of about 4 Å. I'm uncertain whether this region belongs to RNA or protein. Despite the results being incomplete and fragmented, I used Model-Angelo (no-sequence) to build its atomic model. Some regions were identified by Model-Angelo as nucleoside bases, while others were identified as amino acids.
I would like to know if these results are reliable. Are there confidence or probability values available that can help me analyze this structure more accurately?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If you run the program with the flag "--keep-intermediate-results" then it should save extra files into directories named "gnn_output_round_*". If you look at the last folder, "gnn_output_round_3", there should be a file called output_aa_probabilities.aap which gives you the probability of every residue (in order) for every class. You can then see what the relative probabilities between protein and nucleotide are.
Hi,
I have recently been using Model-Angelo to identify an unknown density determined by cryo-EM with a local resolution of about 4 Å. I'm uncertain whether this region belongs to RNA or protein. Despite the results being incomplete and fragmented, I used Model-Angelo (no-sequence) to build its atomic model. Some regions were identified by Model-Angelo as nucleoside bases, while others were identified as amino acids.
I would like to know if these results are reliable. Are there confidence or probability values available that can help me analyze this structure more accurately?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: