You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your kind response for my previous issue.
I have one more question regarding the different model used for the geometry images and material images.
The model for geometry images is Dit, which flattens the image to 1-D for processing, and the model for material images is imagen, which directly inputs the 2-D images. Why not using the Dit for material images generation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for the question.
In theory, yes, DiT can also generate material maps conditioned on the generated geometry.
In practice, we find imagen can learn mateiral maps more easily, while DiT can learn the geometry better.
Thank you for your kind response for my previous issue.
I have one more question regarding the different model used for the geometry images and material images.
The model for geometry images is Dit, which flattens the image to 1-D for processing, and the model for material images is imagen, which directly inputs the 2-D images. Why not using the Dit for material images generation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: