Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Two different models for geometry and texture. #8

Open
linziqu opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Two different models for geometry and texture. #8

linziqu opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@linziqu
Copy link

linziqu commented Sep 10, 2024

Thank you for your kind response for my previous issue.

I have one more question regarding the different model used for the geometry images and material images.
The model for geometry images is Dit, which flattens the image to 1-D for processing, and the model for material images is imagen, which directly inputs the 2-D images. Why not using the Dit for material images generation?

@QhelDIV
Copy link
Collaborator

QhelDIV commented Sep 11, 2024

Hi, thanks for the question.
In theory, yes, DiT can also generate material maps conditioned on the generated geometry.
In practice, we find imagen can learn mateiral maps more easily, while DiT can learn the geometry better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants