We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the feature
. ├── content/ │ └── public/ │ ├── .htacces │ ├── content.md │ ├── error-*.md │ └── sitemap.xml ├── site-dynamic-php/ │ └── public/ │ ├── .htaccess (appended compared to site-static-html) │ ├── error-500.html │ ├── index.php │ └── robots.txt └── site-static-html/ └── public/ ├── .htaccess ├── error-*.html ├── index.html ├── sitemap.xml └── robots.txt
Two commands??
php amos compile:dynamic php amos compile:static
compile:server
site-dynamic-php
.htaccess
error-500.html
compile:static
site-static-html
The .html files should be the same between the two styles.
.html
.htaccess haș the addition of the mod_rewrite to "floor" the server.
mod_rewrite
Why is this feature necessary?
Maintenance and consistency until or unless we choose one or the other.
Let the server be a server.
Describe alternatives you've considered A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thinking the safest and easiest approach would be to create two commands for the generator script.
Sorry, something went wrong.
The site-dynamic-php doesn't actually use any of the static HTML files except error-500.html.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Describe the feature
Two commands??
compile:server
will only updatesite-dynamic-php
..htaccess
.error-500.html
.compile:static
will updatesite-dynamic-php
andsite-static-html
.compile:server
.The
.html
files should be the same between the two styles..htaccess
haș the addition of themod_rewrite
to "floor" the server.Why is this feature necessary?
Maintenance and consistency until or unless we choose one or the other.
Let the server be a server.
Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: