Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

9.2. Wording for actor property implies a requirement #626

Closed
brianjmiller opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #678
Closed

9.2. Wording for actor property implies a requirement #626

brianjmiller opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 0 comments · Fixed by #678

Comments

@brianjmiller
Copy link
Contributor

The Actor property will be defined by the LMS.

This is only slightly covered earlier under "actor" in 8.1 with

The LMS SHOULD create this parameter with an object that is specific to the LMS instance that does NOT include sensitive PII of the learner.

But I think the wording in the above is trying to apply the "SHOULD" to being specific to the LMS and not including PII rather than about the "create" phrase.

Recommendation: switch "will" to be MUST and make it a "proper" requirement.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant