Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

update baud rate of CY8CKIT064B0S2_4343W to 115200 #14403

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 12, 2021

Conversation

saheerb
Copy link
Contributor

@saheerb saheerb commented Mar 10, 2021

Summary of changes

Currently, greentea tests are built with 9600 baudrate. When greentea tests are built for CY8CKIT064B0S2_4343W , the result binaries are combined with a cypress bootloader which is built with 115200. This mismatch in bootloader and application causes a "unicode decode" error in greentea while parsing the serial output. Though when running locally this seems not an issue, when running against devices in our hardware farm this is causing a failure in greentea.

Hence, this PR will update the baud rate of CY8CKIT064B0S2_4343W to 115200.

/!\ We do have an internal ticket to update default baudrate to 115200. As it is a breaking change this will be done only for mbed-os-7

Impact of changes

None that I am ware of.

Migration actions required

None

Documentation

None


Pull request type

[X] Patch update (Bug fix / Target update / Docs update / Test update / Refactor)
[] Feature update (New feature / Functionality change / New API)
[] Major update (Breaking change E.g. Return code change / API behaviour change)

Test results

[] No Tests required for this change (E.g docs only update)
[X] Covered by existing mbed-os tests (Greentea or Unittest)
[] Tests / results supplied as part of this PR

Reviewers

@ARMmbed/team-cypress


@ciarmcom ciarmcom added the release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch label Mar 10, 2021
@ciarmcom ciarmcom requested a review from a team March 10, 2021 10:00
@ciarmcom
Copy link
Member

@saheerb, thank you for your changes.
@ARMmbed/mbed-os-maintainers please review.

@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Mar 11, 2021

CI started

@mbed-ci
Copy link

mbed-ci commented Mar 11, 2021

Jenkins CI Test : ✔️ SUCCESS

Build Number: 1 | 🔒 Jenkins CI Job | 🌐 Logs & Artifacts

CLICK for Detailed Summary

jobs Status
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_unittests ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-greentea-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_build-cloud-example-GCC_ARM ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_cmake-example-test ✔️
jenkins-ci/mbed-os-ci_greentea-test ✔️

@0xc0170 0xc0170 closed this Mar 11, 2021
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Mar 11, 2021

Reopening in a minute, let Travis to rebuild this and we can merge.

@mergify mergify bot removed component: core needs: review release-type: patch Indentifies a PR as containing just a patch labels Mar 11, 2021
@0xc0170 0xc0170 reopened this Mar 11, 2021
@0xc0170
Copy link
Contributor

0xc0170 commented Mar 11, 2021

queued ! :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants