Firefox addon has been removed from Mozilla site #818
-
Addon page Search results Is there an up to date version on github. I could only find an archived one that's 7 years old (https://github.com/ActivityWatch/aw-watcher-firefox). |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 29 replies
-
Thanks for reporting, I was not aware! Looks like Mozilla decided to pull it out of the blue? Logged in and saw this: As you can see, I replied and hope they relist it soon. The correct repo is: https://github.com/ActivityWatch/aw-watcher-web Also reported here: ActivityWatch/aw-watcher-web#94 Edit: It has now been 16 days without reply from Mozilla... Edit 2: Made a post on their forums: https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/add-on-disabled-after-1y-16-days-without-reply-action/107797 Edit 3: After much back and forth with Mozilla's incompetent reviewers who can't follow simple instructions, they wrote the following, with my reply: The links:
I have no interest in satisfying these pointless rules, which provide no user protection at all. If anyone wants to do the work, be my guest, but I have no more patience with the Mozilla Addons people. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Can we convert this to an issue? I'd like to be able to be notified solely of its remediation, rather than be subscribed for every update. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Thanks for reporting, I was not aware!
Looks like Mozilla decided to pull it out of the blue? Logged in and saw this:
As you can see, I replied and hope they relist it soon.
The correct repo is: https://github.com/ActivityWatch/aw-watcher-web
Also reported here: ActivityWatch/aw-watcher-web#94
Edit: It has now been 16 days without reply from Mozilla...
Edit 2: Made a post on their forums: https://discourse.mozilla.org/t/add-on-disabled-after-1y-16-days-without-reply-action/107797
Edit 3: After much back and forth with Mozilla's incompetent reviewers who can't follow simple instructions, they wrote the following, with my reply:
The links: