You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
At the moment, a node can only be split horizontally or vertically once, with a fraction indicating how far apart the two are.
In the scenario where I split horizontally twice, I would love for it to instead split into 3 equally-sized chunks [A | B | C], rather than
[A | [B | C]
Describe alternatives you've considered
We could hack around this by twiddling with fraction values based on the tree as a whole, but it's probably easy enough to migrate into a non-binary tree structure. probably.
Additional context
I'm planning to work on this over the weekend, but making an issue for it just incase this is something you're interested in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
At the moment, a node can only be split horizontally or vertically once, with a fraction indicating how far apart the two are.
In the scenario where I split horizontally twice, I would love for it to instead split into 3 equally-sized chunks
[A | B | C]
, rather thanDescribe alternatives you've considered
We could hack around this by twiddling with
fraction
values based on the tree as a whole, but it's probably easy enough to migrate into a non-binary tree structure. probably.Additional context
I'm planning to work on this over the weekend, but making an issue for it just incase this is something you're interested in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: