Replies: 1 comment
-
Yes and no. I've been taking a short break from working on Adept 2.* to explore the future. In the meantime, I've been experimenting and designing possible candidates for Adept 3.0. I've created several variations of what Adept 3.0 might look like, and the goal is to make important breaking changes in 3.0 so that Adept 3.1 and beyond can remain 99% backwards compatible similar to how Adept 2.* versions are. Also, I've been experimenting with the idea of an alternative mini self-hosted compiler that is made for creating extremely portable applications. The project isn't open source yet, but if the ideas behind it work out then it will be shown off and made public. That being said, I feel that Adept 2.* is a pretty complete language. Adept 2.* will continue to receive improvements, bug fixes, and updates in the future. I've created many projects in it, so it is in my interest to maintain it. Right now though, my focus is finding how to best create Adept 3.0. The goal is to decide where backwards-compatibility should be broken and how things should be improved going forward. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
It seems development is stagnant.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions