Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incapability to maintain custom filtering rules #1071

Closed
ghost opened this issue Oct 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Incapability to maintain custom filtering rules #1071

ghost opened this issue Oct 15, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
duplicate Duplicate or merged issues.

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Oct 15, 2019

Steps to Reproduce

  • Open below pages in two separate tabs and keep them opened
    https://xxx.xxx.xx.xxx/#filters
    https://xxx.xxx.xx.xxx/#logs

  • Block any domain name using 'block' button on query log page then go to filters page and refresh, you'll see it updated under 'custom filtering rules'

  • Write any domain names on 'custom filtering rules' field then click apply. If necessary refresh the page to ensure it applied as well

  • Go to query log page again and block a domain name

  • Then go back to filters page and refresh, you'll see all manually written domain names erased (means from .yaml file)

(It doesn't occur when perform that task within single tab)

AdGuard Home v0.98.1 | Windows

@Aikatsui
Copy link
Contributor

Aikatsui commented Dec 1, 2020

Related but not duplicate #2374

@ameshkov ameshkov added duplicate Duplicate or merged issues. and removed P3: Medium UI enhancement labels Dec 2, 2020
@ameshkov ameshkov removed this from the v1.0 milestone Dec 2, 2020
@ameshkov
Copy link
Member

ameshkov commented Dec 2, 2020

Tbh I think this IS duplicate and will be solved automatically if #2374 is implemented.

@ameshkov ameshkov closed this as completed Dec 2, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate Duplicate or merged issues.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants