-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Private rDNS can't point to specified upstream #3273
Comments
Hello. We cannot reproduce this on the master branch—which is what I assume you meant by “v0.107.0”, because that version isn't released yet. Can you configure AdGuard Home to collect verbose logs by setting
Also, make sure that you put those lines into the “Private reverse DNS servers” section. |
all use same config file but I left the setting by following into Upstream Servers section and left Private rDNS with 10.122.15.53 and 10.121.55.228
In previous version I can resolve PTR w/o issue, and verbose log for upstreams:
in this version I can resolve after I upgrade w/o change any config
resolve any previous was successful IP addresses as null PTR unless I cut rDNS upstreams config from Upstream Servers into Private rDNS sections |
Yes, private reverse DNS upstreams must be in the “Private reverse DNS servers” section. Also, there you can replace the last two lines of your upstreams with a simple If you do this, is the issue solved? |
Additionally, I found wiki was describe the syntax as for general upstream servers and make private IP range split out of Upstream Servers since v0.106.0, but release note was not notice or warnings that was a breaking changes. Also I'm digging all of rDNS issues and I found @ameshkov comment that is a breaking changes in this thread If it wouldn't make a notice for misplaced upstreams or make description more detailed for Private rDNS, this issue can close for my unconcerned of documents |
It's true that the documentation there is still suppar. We'll try to make the interaction between the two inputs clearer, thanks! |
@Haraguroicha, we've updated the wiki page. Could you please check the new reverse DNS upstreams section and tell us if the documentation is now clear enough? Thanks! |
I think that is enough detail for a player, but need to point out the PTR resolve for private range IP addresses is only affect when setting in private rDNS upstreams section and must enable "Use private reverse DNS resolvers" And please do a note for notice that is a breaking change since v0.106.0, before v0.106.0 it can serve private rDNS by setting in "Upstream DNS servers" and need to split those upstreams manually since v0.106.0. |
I think this issue can merge to #3307 for tracking same thing? |
Hm, yes, we should probably do that. |
Have a question or an idea? Please search it on our forum to make sure it was not yet asked. If you cannot find what you had in mind, please submit it here.
Prerequisites
Please answer the following questions for yourself before submitting an issue. YOU MAY DELETE THE PREREQUISITES SECTION.
Issue Details
Expected Behavior
before v0.106.0 (e.g. v0.105.0), the behavior was expected by following config was set
dig -x 10.120.0.1
return a PTR records from A upstreamdig -x 192.168.0.1
return a PTR records from B upstreamActual Behavior
dig -x 10.120.0.1
ordig -x 192.168.0.1
return a record which was unexpected, that is random response from Private rDNS Servers when enable Private rDNS feature or always return nothing when disabled Private rDNS featureScreenshots
Screenshot:
Additional Information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: