-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
AdGuard Home v0.107.42 not working correctly with keepalived / virtual IP #6506
Comments
I have a similar issue, after updating to v0.107.42 (Adguard Home in Ubuntu 20.04 in WSL2 in Win11) adguard appears to only bind to one IP address (not the same one as before the update). Changed my config from bind: 0.0.0.0 to use {primary IP} and 127.0.0.1 and its working again.
|
I have a similar setup. AdGuardHome running in a Proxmox LXC container for my primary DNS with keepalived and the secondary is running on a raspberry pi. v0.107.42 was not working at all, I lost all DNS resolution. I had downgrade too to v.107.41. Now it's working again. |
I have the same problem...no dns forwarding on v0.107.42. Runs in docker on unraid |
I have the same problem. UDP responses do not reach the client. TCP responses are ok.
|
Thx, it works for me! |
After editing the bind_hosts and adding 192.168.1.12 it works fine |
This is a nasty bug which took me a while to figure out. |
How do you proceed to downgrade, I was not able to find a detailed procedure? |
in docker, instead of |
@nohn, hello. A few questions to clarify:
|
The new version in Docker cannot connect to the upstreams using HTTP/3, which is based on UDP. Not sure whether it's the same issue. |
We've released a fix to a similar issue in version v0.108.0-a.788+7b5cce51 on the Edge channel. Can anyone affected by this one check? |
I can. However, I'm running the binary distribution and the latest available release is v0.108.0-b.51 |
I've pulled the adguard/adguardhome:edge and now plain DNS over UDP works again for me |
@nohn, releases on the Edge channels are basically daily builds and are not uploaded to GitHub. We have the links to all release channels on the Platforms page on the Wiki. |
I can confirm the fix with v0.108.0-a.788+7b5cce51 on Linux in a keepalived setup with floating IPs. |
Great, thanks for testing. We'll release a fix next week then. Edit: The fix was committed as part of #6510. |
The latest upgrade broke this for me too. So nice to see such a super-fast response ... and that I'm not the only geek running a keepalived setup with AGH! |
For those who have been following this issue, we've just released the |
issue resolved here as well now with v.0.107.42. Thanks! |
Hi all, I have the same problem of the author of that post. I have the AdGuard Home MASTER running on a Ubuntu 22.04 CT in Proxmox and the BACKUP one is running on a standalone mini PC with Ubuntu server 22.04. Everything is working fine, I can access both webUI, the sync is working and if I try to enter the VIP created with keepalived I get redirected to the webUI of the AGH configured as MASTER. Reading the comments I saw that this was a bug of v0.107.42, solved in v0.107.43 I don't consider myself an expert. I'm doing some experiments to improve my home network and actually, this is my first experience with high availability and sync between servers. So feel free to tell me if I'm doing something wrong or if I can improve something. Hope someone can help. |
hi, thanks in advance for your help |
Prerequisites
I have checked the Wiki and Discussions and found no answer
I have searched other issues and found no duplicates
I want to report a bug and not ask a question or ask for help
I have set up AdGuard Home correctly and configured clients to use it. (Use the Discussions for help with installing and configuring clients.)
Platform (OS and CPU architecture)
Linux, AMD64 (aka x86_64)
Installation
GitHub releases or script from README
Setup
Other (please mention in the description)
AdGuard Home version
v0.107.42
Action
I'm running two AdGuardHome instances in a high availability setup using keepalived and virtual IP.
Expected result
AdGuardHome responds to DNS requests on both host and virtual IP.
Actual result
Up until v0.107.41 this worked fine. After upgrading to v0.107.42, DNS does not respond on the virtual IP, only on the host IP. The web interface works on all IPs. Downgrading to v0.107.41 immediately fixes this issue.
Additional information and/or screenshots
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: