You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been putting some summary statistics together for the sequencing I have done and I noticed that there are some samples that have an unusually low number of sequences in their FastA file. After looking at the trimming files it looks like there was an issue translating the FastQ to FastA where the FastA file is incomplete. I have included a table of the samples for which I have picked up this inconsistency (not too many affected – just 10 out of 4000 samples). The “PropPassQC” column is usually ~94% and these are the samples with less than 90% and they all have the issue where the number of sequences in the FastA file is less than what the trim report says it should be (“Reads written (passing filters)”). Despite this error they still pass my QC threshold of having 100,000 reads.
I was wondering if we could add a test where we check whether the number of reads in the FastA is the same as the FastQ and generates an error if they are different?
e.g. #demultuplex , #trim, #fasta , #non-redundant etc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: