You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I am learning the structure of package pkg, I find that there are at least three packages which should be moved out of it:
client
quota
runconfig
Here is my reason:
we usually keep totally general packages in package pkg, while three packages above are something specific, client is for control server or something like that, quota for filesystem quota for container, and runconfig is for pouch container's some kind of config parameter.
I wish we could add a folder which is named storage, then some structure may be like:
Ⅰ. Issue Description
When I am learning the structure of package pkg, I find that there are at least three packages which should be moved out of it:
Here is my reason:
we usually keep totally general packages in package pkg, while three packages above are something specific, client is for control server or something like that, quota for filesystem quota for container, and runconfig is for pouch container's some kind of config parameter.
I wish we could add a folder which is named storage, then some structure may be like:
Actually I am afraid the package name of client is not my dishes. Like the code makes me feel confused:
Here, I think client is a struct instance, however it is a package. So hard to understand and quite awkward.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: