Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specimen-->locality page needs some changes #2102

Closed
dustymc opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Specimen-->locality page needs some changes #2102

dustymc opened this issue May 31, 2019 · 1 comment
Labels
Function-Locality/Event/Georeferencing Function-ObjectRecord Help wanted I have a question on how to use Arctos Priority-High (Needed for work) High because this is causing a delay in important collection work..

Comments

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented May 31, 2019

#1357 (and good management in general) has the potential to add lots of specimen-events. It's difficult to tell what's what in the current edit form.

  • move verificationstatus to the top near event type
  • dual-sort events
    • by event type with verificationstatus != 'unaccepted' then
    • by event type with verificationstatus = 'unaccepted'
  • add some color or ?? - esp. unaccepted events should have a gray background or similar
  • add maps: only one Event currently maps, and it's an image. Add real maps with WKT for geography and locality.
    • can we somehow - here and elsewhere - get all of the events on one map?? Should we? Seems useful for events-as-opinons, not so much for events as separate events.

Is there anything else that can be made better on that form?

@dustymc dustymc added Priority-High (Needed for work) High because this is causing a delay in important collection work.. Function-Locality/Event/Georeferencing Function-ObjectRecord Help wanted I have a question on how to use Arctos labels May 31, 2019
@dustymc dustymc added this to the Needs Discussion milestone May 31, 2019
@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor Author

dustymc commented Jun 3, 2019

Made some easy changes. Multiple "real" maps seems possible but not trivial. One is easier, but likely to be visually overwhelming if there are dozens of localities involved. I'm not sure how to prioritize this - you can't DO anything about it from this page so maybe low, but this may be a good place to detect a problem so maybe higher??

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Function-Locality/Event/Georeferencing Function-ObjectRecord Help wanted I have a question on how to use Arctos Priority-High (Needed for work) High because this is causing a delay in important collection work..
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant