Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request - parent geography #3108

Closed
dustymc opened this issue Sep 11, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Feature Request - parent geography #3108

dustymc opened this issue Sep 11, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer!

Comments

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Sep 11, 2020

A "parent" geography would be useful, particularly for small features (if those should be geography at all - #1366) and those without their own polygons. For example,

https://arctos.database.museum/place.cfm?action=detail&geog_auth_rec_id=1005444

Screen Shot 2020-09-11 at 11 29 04 AM

The northern points are almost certainly outside of both the asserted geography and the "parent" county, which does have spatial boundaries.

https://arctos.database.museum/place.cfm?action=detail&geog_auth_rec_id=1001706

It might be possible to dynamically derive parent for some entries, but some will be more complicated than scripts can readily handle and will produce unintended results.

Suggest adding "parent geography"

geog_auth_rec.parent_geog_auth_rec references geog_auth_rec.geog_auth_rec_id

which would allow users to assert a "check at least this much" option (and perhaps we can attempt to initially populate it with scripts).

@dustymc dustymc added the Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! label Sep 11, 2020
@dustymc dustymc added this to the Needs Discussion milestone Sep 11, 2020
@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor Author

dustymc commented Dec 10, 2020

See #3272 (comment) - multiple parentage might be more useful, should we find data to support using it.

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor Author

dustymc commented Feb 15, 2022

This is probably best addressed by #4289

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer!
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant