Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request - agent status vocabulary #4559

Closed
dustymc opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 5 comments
Closed

Feature Request - agent status vocabulary #4559

dustymc opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 5 comments
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Agents Priority-High (Needed for work) High because this is causing a delay in important collection work..

Comments

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Apr 14, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I just declared a corporation "alive." Can we come up with better vocabulary?

Describe what you're trying to accomplish

Terms that imply "still there" (and etc.) to all Agents.

Describe the solution you'd like

Better terms?

Describe alternatives you've considered

Current terms seem to be functional enough, just strange. We could just expand documentation.

Additional context

@dustymc dustymc added the Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! label Apr 14, 2022
@dustymc dustymc added this to the Needs Discussion milestone Apr 14, 2022
@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member

extant = in existence

I don't know - I think we need different terms for orgs and people...it sucks, but saying a person is extant or operational doesn't feel very good. Is there a reason we have both "dead" and "died"? It seems like using died with no date is the equivalent of dead? Same goes for alive and born when there is no died?

people live and die, organizations are formed and dissolved

@Jegelewicz Jegelewicz added Priority-High (Needed for work) High because this is causing a delay in important collection work.. Function-Agents labels Apr 14, 2022
@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor Author

dustymc commented Apr 14, 2022

need different terms for orgs and people

I'll take awkward terms over that; I want to ask "can this event realistically be associated with that Agent" and I may not know or care which pigeonhole the agent has been stuffed into.

using died with no date

That's not structurally possible, and I think the "came into state/in state" distinction is useful.

people .. are formed and dissolved

I giggled....

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member

Well then, I say just use alive and dead for orgs because I'd rather offend an org than a person.....

@AJLinn
Copy link

AJLinn commented Apr 14, 2022

I agree - I use the born/died all the time when I'm doing organizational agents for the date of incorporation or the date of dissolution. It is awkward but unambiguous.

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member

Code Table Committee says just stick with alive and dead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Agents Priority-High (Needed for work) High because this is causing a delay in important collection work..
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants