Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Feature Request - try to match agents to verbatim whateverwecallems #4872

Closed
dustymc opened this issue Jul 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Feature Request - try to match agents to verbatim whateverwecallems #4872

dustymc opened this issue Jul 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
Blocked Issue cannot be addressed until another Issue (which should be linked) is addressed. Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Agents Priority-Normal (Not urgent) Normal because this needs to get done but not immediately.
Milestone
Tabled

Comments

@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Jul 28, 2022

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

I'd like to make more use of verbatim agents, but they should also be reconciled with actual Agents when possible.

Describe what you're trying to accomplish

Better data, less work.

Describe the solution you'd like

On edit agent, see if we can dynamically round up verbatim agents that might be representations of the active agent.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Bigger messes in Agents.

Additional context

#4554 (comment)

Priority

Fairly high? Don't think this can be controversial so going next task, but please let me know if I'm not seeing something.

Blocked by #4871 - no reason to write something then immediately have to change it.
@dustymc dustymc added Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Blocked Issue cannot be addressed until another Issue (which should be linked) is addressed. labels Jul 28, 2022
@dustymc dustymc added this to the Next Task milestone Jul 28, 2022
@Nicole-Ridgwell-NMMNHS
Copy link

This seems like a good idea to me.

@lin-fred lin-fred mentioned this issue Aug 2, 2022
Closed
@dustymc dustymc mentioned this issue Aug 4, 2022
Closed
@lin-fred lin-fred removed the Blocked Issue cannot be addressed until another Issue (which should be linked) is addressed. label Aug 10, 2022
@Jegelewicz Jegelewicz added the Priority-Normal (Not urgent) Normal because this needs to get done but not immediately. label Dec 1, 2022
@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member

Once we make the great agent transition, this priority needs to get bumped up.

@dustymc dustymc mentioned this issue Jan 2, 2024
Closed
@dustymc dustymc added the Blocked Issue cannot be addressed until another Issue (which should be linked) is addressed. label Jan 18, 2024
@dustymc dustymc modified the milestones: Next Task, Tabled Jan 25, 2024
@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor Author

dustymc commented Jan 25, 2024

I don't think this has a place post-#6813, tabling.

@dustymc dustymc closed this as completed Jan 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Blocked Issue cannot be addressed until another Issue (which should be linked) is addressed. Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Agents Priority-Normal (Not urgent) Normal because this needs to get done but not immediately.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Tabled
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@dustymc @Jegelewicz @lin-fred @Nicole-Ridgwell-NMMNHS