Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request - review of Agents created by students #7134

Closed
Jegelewicz opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Feature Request - review of Agents created by students #7134

Jegelewicz opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Agents Priority-Low (Wish list) I don't want to forget this, but it doesn't need to be done immediately

Comments

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member

Issue Documentation is http://handbook.arctosdb.org/how_to/How-to-Use-Issues-in-Arctos.html

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
A clear and concise description of what the problem is. Ex. I'm always frustrated when [...]

From interviews by @ekrimmel about Agents:

It would be helpful to review agents created by OGL students. QC is even more important given that these records are shared with everyone else in Arctos.

Describe what you're trying to accomplish
A clear and concise overview of the goals; why are you asking for this?

Add some curatorial review for Agents

Describe the solution you'd like
How might we accomplish your goals?

A notification for recently created agents? Some way to put agents entered into a holding place for review before final load?

@happiah-madson @falco-rk any other ideas?

Describe alternatives you've considered
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.

Have students report agents they have created so supervisors can review. (A manual process)

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

This seems like a fairly reasonable idea, but not sure how it would work in the real world....

Priority
Please assign a priority-label. Unprioritized issues gets sent into a black hole of despair.

@Jegelewicz Jegelewicz added Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Priority-Low (Wish list) I don't want to forget this, but it doesn't need to be done immediately labels Dec 15, 2023
@Jegelewicz Jegelewicz added this to the Needs Discussion milestone Dec 15, 2023
@dustymc
Copy link
Contributor

dustymc commented Dec 18, 2023

This can be searched now and I can build reports or provide SQL or whatever, but it also seems to be nothing more than a symptom of being stuck in the middle between two systems. We should address the problem rather than whacking at symptoms.

If #6813 goes one way, then agents should all have sufficient disambiguating data and it shouldn't much matter who created them.

If #6813 goes the other way, Agents will be expected to include low-quality duplicates and etc., and again it won't much matter who created them.

(Not sure what being stuck here means, but it's not very comfortable!)

@Jegelewicz
Copy link
Member Author

@ArctosDB/agents-committee @falco-rk propose we close.

@falco-rk falco-rk closed this as completed Apr 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement I think this would make Arctos even awesomer! Function-Agents Priority-Low (Wish list) I don't want to forget this, but it doesn't need to be done immediately
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants