Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add filter condition to document evaluation summary #2889

Closed
Tracked by #1689
axiomofjoy opened this issue Apr 13, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3039
Closed
Tracked by #1689

add filter condition to document evaluation summary #2889

axiomofjoy opened this issue Apr 13, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3039
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@axiomofjoy
Copy link
Contributor

axiomofjoy commented Apr 13, 2024

add filter condition to document evaluation summary

Originally posted by @axiomofjoy in #2888 (comment)

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 📘 Todo in phoenix Apr 13, 2024
@axiomofjoy axiomofjoy self-assigned this Apr 13, 2024
@dosubot dosubot bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 13, 2024
@mikeldking
Copy link
Contributor

Punting

@mikeldking mikeldking assigned axiomofjoy and unassigned axiomofjoy Apr 19, 2024
@axiomofjoy axiomofjoy moved this from 📘 Todo to 👨‍💻 In progress in phoenix Apr 24, 2024
@axiomofjoy
Copy link
Contributor Author

Actually, think this is more than one line of work. Punting.

@axiomofjoy axiomofjoy removed their assignment Apr 24, 2024
@axiomofjoy axiomofjoy moved this from 👨‍💻 In progress to 📘 Todo in phoenix Apr 24, 2024
@RogerHYang RogerHYang linked a pull request Apr 30, 2024 that will close this issue
@RogerHYang RogerHYang self-assigned this Apr 30, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📘 Todo to ✅ Done in phoenix May 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants