Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

TimeLockMinter (cannot withdraw from minter until claim-window has elapsed) #173

Open
jakerockland opened this issue May 11, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

TimeLockMinter (cannot withdraw from minter until claim-window has elapsed) #173

jakerockland opened this issue May 11, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
ideation Not yet in an actionable state minter-type Suggestion for a new/iterated minter type

Comments

@jakerockland
Copy link
Contributor

Idea: minters where the mint is held in the minter for a time lock specified by the artist, to prevent immediate secondary speculation?
@jakerockland jakerockland added enhancement New feature or request minter-type Suggestion for a new/iterated minter type labels May 11, 2022
@jakerockland jakerockland changed the title Time-locked minters TimeLockMinter (cannot claim token from minter until artist-defined time has elapsed) May 18, 2022
@jakerockland
Copy link
Contributor Author

We definitely would need min/max times associated with the time-locks, to avoid an artist accidentally locking tokens ~indefinitely. Initial thinking would be to make the initial min-time 1 day, and initial max time 1 year.

@jakerockland jakerockland changed the title TimeLockMinter (cannot claim token from minter until artist-defined time has elapsed) TimeLockMinter (cannot withdraw from minter until claim-window has elapsed) May 18, 2022
@ryley-o
Copy link
Contributor

ryley-o commented May 18, 2022

Simple and this makes sense to me.
definitely have to limit this to being minted by EOAs to prevent the pieces from being traded on secondary (via "ownership" nfts of contracts with ability to claim tokens in future).

@jakerockland
Copy link
Contributor Author

definitely have to limit this to being minted by EOAs to prevent the pieces from being traded on secondary (via "ownership" nfts of contracts with ability to claim tokens in future).

Makes sense and is kinda trippy.

@jakerockland jakerockland added ideation Not yet in an actionable state and removed enhancement New feature or request labels May 18, 2022
@jakerockland
Copy link
Contributor Author

Whoops, lol I realized that the recently filed #412 is just a duplicate of this issue.

Closing #412 as this issue is older.

@jakerockland jakerockland mentioned this issue Jan 6, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
ideation Not yet in an actionable state minter-type Suggestion for a new/iterated minter type
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@jakerockland @ryley-o