Improve small integer overflow checks #96

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Closed

dcodeIO opened this issue May 5, 2018 · 0 comments

Labels

Member

dcodeIO commented May 5, 2018

As a follow-up to #38 and #87, there might still be quite a few more opportunities for avoiding zero-/sign-extensions in the respective check.

Feel free to let me know if you are encountering one (or if a check is wrong), and of course to improve the checks within a PR :)

dcodeIO added enhancement good first issue labels

dcodeIO removed the good first issue label

dcodeIO closed this as completed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment