You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Tested first on the 9895 duplicate pairs (19790 records) with same taxon (= matched scientific name), same repository, same catalog number (#96):
5448 pairs with both records flagged 'false'
1571 pairs with both records flagged 'true'
2876 pairs with 1 record flagged 'false', the other 'true'
That's one kind of duplicate. From the full beetles data set I also generated record abstracts with 'Possible duplicate record', 'Matched Scientific Name', 'Locality', 'Latitude - processed', 'Longitude - processed', 'Collector', 'Event Date - parsed' and 'Basis Of Record - processed'. These are same taxon collected at same place on same date by same collector. Each abstract below is prefixed with the number of repeats.
In many cases a single abstract is flagged 'false' and its repeats are flagged 'true', which is what I would expect for a 'Possible duplicate record' flag:
1 false Onthophagus sydneyensis -32.58486 151.00613 Gollan, Mr John - Australian Museum - Science 2005-11-18 PreservedSpecimen
97 true Onthophagus sydneyensis -32.58486 151.00613 Gollan, Mr John - Australian Museum - Science 2005-11-18 PreservedSpecimen
But the 'true' and 'false' assignments are inconsistent, e.g.
10 false Zygocera lugubris Mount Gambier -37.81106163 140.7444735 D. Hangen 1988-12-12 PreservedSpecimen
2 true Zygocera lugubris Mount Gambier -37.81106163 140.7444735 D. Hangen 1988-12-12 PreservedSpecimen
8 false Anoplognathus narmarus Pitchi Ritchi Pass nr. Port Augusta -32.5 137.7667 Moulds,M.S. & Moulds,B.J. 1976-01-17 PreservedSpecimen
13 true Anoplognathus narmarus Pitchi Ritchi Pass nr. Port Augusta -32.5 137.7667 Moulds,M.S. & Moulds,B.J. 1976-01-17 PreservedSpecimen
9 false Eupoecila inscripta Exmouth -21.923847 114.11691 Bill & Mark Bell 2008-04-01 Image
8 true Eupoecila inscripta Exmouth -21.923847 114.11691 Bill & Mark Bell 2008-04-01 Image
371332 false
85743 true
Tested first on the 9895 duplicate pairs (19790 records) with same taxon (= matched scientific name), same repository, same catalog number (#96):
5448 pairs with both records flagged 'false'
1571 pairs with both records flagged 'true'
2876 pairs with 1 record flagged 'false', the other 'true'
That's one kind of duplicate. From the full beetles data set I also generated record abstracts with 'Possible duplicate record', 'Matched Scientific Name', 'Locality', 'Latitude - processed', 'Longitude - processed', 'Collector', 'Event Date - parsed' and 'Basis Of Record - processed'. These are same taxon collected at same place on same date by same collector. Each abstract below is prefixed with the number of repeats.
In many cases a single abstract is flagged 'false' and its repeats are flagged 'true', which is what I would expect for a 'Possible duplicate record' flag:
1 false Onthophagus sydneyensis -32.58486 151.00613 Gollan, Mr John - Australian Museum - Science 2005-11-18 PreservedSpecimen
97 true Onthophagus sydneyensis -32.58486 151.00613 Gollan, Mr John - Australian Museum - Science 2005-11-18 PreservedSpecimen
But the 'true' and 'false' assignments are inconsistent, e.g.
10 false Zygocera lugubris Mount Gambier -37.81106163 140.7444735 D. Hangen 1988-12-12 PreservedSpecimen
2 true Zygocera lugubris Mount Gambier -37.81106163 140.7444735 D. Hangen 1988-12-12 PreservedSpecimen
8 false Anoplognathus narmarus Pitchi Ritchi Pass nr. Port Augusta -32.5 137.7667 Moulds,M.S. & Moulds,B.J. 1976-01-17 PreservedSpecimen
13 true Anoplognathus narmarus Pitchi Ritchi Pass nr. Port Augusta -32.5 137.7667 Moulds,M.S. & Moulds,B.J. 1976-01-17 PreservedSpecimen
9 false Eupoecila inscripta Exmouth -21.923847 114.11691 Bill & Mark Bell 2008-04-01 Image
8 true Eupoecila inscripta Exmouth -21.923847 114.11691 Bill & Mark Bell 2008-04-01 Image
5 false Coelophora inaequalis Hodgson Vale -27.6228 151.9373 Arthur Chapman 2010-05-07 Image
3 true Coelophora inaequalis Hodgson Vale -27.6228 151.9373 Arthur Chapman 2010-05-07 Image
2 false Tesserodon feehani 14km W by N Hope Vale Mission -15.26667 144.9833 Feehan,J.E. 1981-05-07 PreservedSpecimen
3 true Tesserodon feehani 14km W by N Hope Vale Mission -15.26667 144.9833 Feehan,J.E. 1981-05-07 PreservedSpecimen
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: