Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 7, 2023. It is now read-only.

Invalid position given by 'W002' #452

Open
ramki99 opened this issue Jul 5, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Invalid position given by 'W002' #452

ramki99 opened this issue Jul 5, 2017 · 3 comments
Labels

Comments

@ramki99
Copy link

ramki99 commented Jul 5, 2017

JSHint returned a point that did not exist in the document being edited.
Rule: W002
Requested start point: 374:18

Debug information:

Atom version: 1.16.0
linter-jshint version: v3.1.4
JSHint version: jshint v2.9.5
Hours since last Atom restart: 53.5
Platform: darwin
Current file's scopes: [
  "source.js",
  "meta.method-call.js",
  "meta.arguments.js",
  "meta.method-call.js",
  "meta.arguments.js",
  "meta.method-call.js",
  "meta.arguments.js",
  "meta.method-call.js",
  "meta.arguments.js",
  "punctuation.definition.function.body.end.bracket.curly.js"
]
linter-jshint configuration: {
  "executablePath": "",
  "lintInlineJavaScript": false,
  "disableWhenNoJshintrcFileInPath": false,
  "scopes": [
    "source.js",
    "source.js-semantic"
  ],
  "jshintFileName": ".jshintrc",
  "jshintignoreFilename": ".jshintignore"
}
@Arcanemagus
Copy link
Member

Is your code indented by tabs?

@lukidoescode
Copy link

Mine is. I got the same error. I like tabs better because everybody can have it her/his way with them. IMHO tabs are cleaner.

@Arcanemagus
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the confirmation @m3t4lukas.

This is almost certainly another case of jshint/jshint#3151. There are reports that if you set your indent property of your JSHint configuration to 1 this issue can be worked around. If you don't have a .jshintrc file the following should work:

{
  "indent": 1
}

If anyone is directed here and isn't using tabs to indent please provide code to reproduce this so an issue can be filed on JSHint to get this fixed there.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants