Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stepper sockets in Rev E still defect #17

Closed
repetier opened this issue Jan 8, 2020 · 3 comments
Closed

Stepper sockets in Rev E still defect #17

repetier opened this issue Jan 8, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@repetier
Copy link

repetier commented Jan 8, 2020

Hi @chrissbarr ,
I purchased a RUMBA32 Rev E to add support for your board to Repetier-Firmware V2 (https://github.com/repetier/Repetier-Firmware/tree/dev2) and it is working already very good.

I read that up to Rev D there is a problem with SPI MOSI pin connected to wrong pin header, so was lucky to have a "fixed" board. But after searching for hours I detected that reading the driver does not work due to same pin switch. So not sure if it was meant to be fixed or if that was Rev E in old version or if it is different producer since I ordered it in Germany, but it contains your domain on backside.

Beside that it would be nice if you would add a reference to the additional firmware possible with that board.

@leseaw
Copy link

leseaw commented Jan 8, 2020

Rev E has this error too :(

@chrissbarr
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @repetier, @leseaw.

Sorry there was no reply on this earlier. I have not been getting notifications from this repo, and am going through at the moment trying to get caught up.

To confirm, the SPI defect is present in v1.0E. I have put together a central FAQ issue on this here, for future reference: #23

Really cool to hear that the board is being supported within Repetier-Firmware V2! I will give it a go when I receive the next batch of boards.

@chrissbarr chrissbarr reopened this Jun 2, 2020
@chrissbarr
Copy link
Contributor

I have added a link to Repetier-Firmware in the readme:

image

Let me know if you would prefer different wording or a different URL linked to.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants