-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 384
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1103/add Amp_Embed_Sanitizer #1128
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1476e1d
Fix issue #1103: Embed instagram not transformed to amp-instagram.
47b94c4
adding correct sanitizer
5011ad1
Merge branch 'develop' into 1103/fixEmbedInstagramSanitizer
6c048cb
Adding Amp_Embed_Sanitizer and adding sanitize_raw_embed to instagram…
bf54b71
adding test to amp-instagram-embed and adding raw sanitizer amp-faceb…
12faea4
Adding sanitize_raw_embeds for twitter blockquotes
edf6dc1
Fix twitter tests
2dad0ae
Merge branch 'develop' into 1103/fixEmbedInstagramSanitizer
westonruter f16f6df
merging is_facebook_raw_embed with get_embed_type
569054a
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/1103/fixEmbedInstagramSanitizer'…
6417096
Merge branch 'develop' of https://github.com/Automattic/amp-wp into 1…
westonruter 6dd08a7
Ensure embed scripts for Twitter and Instagram get removed
westonruter File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am curious to find out what the performance impacts are between
$this->dom->getElementsByTagName( 'div' )
and then filtering out the ones that have the required attributes (is_facebook_raw_embed
) .vs using XPath to obtain just the exact matching set up front, for example via:Given that
div
is a very generic element, I worry about the performance impacts of locating elements in large documents. But I'm not sure if XPath would be faster.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I created a quick benchmark checking both implementations:
seems like xpath isn't faster.