We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Double-check whether we need the following public inputs for the root rollup, and if not, remove them:
previous_block_hash
previous_archive
previous_archive.next_available_leaf_index
end_block_hash
previous
end_archive.next_available_leaf_index
out_hash
end_timestamp
end_block_number
end_archive
Also see the comments on #8704 for more context.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
See https://aztecprotocol.slack.com/archives/C060PU5R327/p1727440318089379
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Double-check whether we need the following public inputs for the root rollup, and if not, remove them:
previous_block_hash
: Should be committed to as part of theprevious_archive
previous_archive.next_available_leaf_index
: Don't we just need the root?end_block_hash
: Same asprevious
end_archive.next_available_leaf_index
: Same asprevious
out_hash
: Not checked anywhere in L1, also part of block header, so it's committed to as part of the archive rootend_timestamp
: Can be derived from the end block's slot number if needed, also not checked on L1end_block_number
: Only used to look up theend_archive
on L1, but if we know the epoch being proven, this could be derivedAlso see the comments on #8704 for more context.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: