Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: Nested User Defined Types to show up in the readme #4174

Closed
ahmadabdalla opened this issue Nov 1, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4175
Closed

[Feature Request]: Nested User Defined Types to show up in the readme #4174

ahmadabdalla opened this issue Nov 1, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #4175
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@ahmadabdalla
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Currently the readme that is generated for user defined types is that it supports 1 level for exposing the properties in the readme.

For example: if a UDT contains (A, B) properties, then the readme will expose A and B separately in the readme. Which is great.

However, if the UDT contains (A, B (B1, B2)) .. then (B.B1) and (B.B2) will not be shown in the readme.

Ideally we should be able to drill down in the nesting so that the guidance is clear for nested properties as well.

@ahmadabdalla ahmadabdalla added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 1, 2023
@AlexanderSehr
Copy link
Contributor

Example:
image

source

@AlexanderSehr AlexanderSehr added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 1, 2023
@AlexanderSehr AlexanderSehr self-assigned this Nov 1, 2023
@AlexanderSehr AlexanderSehr added enhancement New feature or request and removed enhancement New feature or request bug Something isn't working labels Nov 1, 2023
@AlexanderSehr AlexanderSehr linked a pull request Nov 1, 2023 that will close this issue
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants