CI needs an analysis step to validate http links in XML doc comments

[christothes]

PRs like this are a good example of the need for some link validation to check for things like locales.

#22215

[scottaddie]

In addition to flagging locale strings, the analysis step should flag MSDN links. All msdn.microsoft.com links should be replaced with docs.microsoft.com links. Here's an example of a link that violates both rules:

azure-sdk-for-net/sdk/eventhub/Microsoft.Azure.Management.EventHub/src/Generated/PrivateEndpointConnectionsOperationsExtensions.cs

Line 26 in c7e337d

/// <see href="https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/mt639412.aspx" />

@weshaggard This is related to our chat. The link checker script currently scans Markdown files. This proposal entails expanding beyond that to include *.cs files.

[github-actions]

Hi @christothes, we deeply appreciate your input into this project. Regrettably, this issue has remained inactive for over 2 years, leading us to the decision to close it. We've implemented this policy to maintain the relevance of our issue queue and facilitate easier navigation for new contributors. If you still believe this topic requires attention, please feel free to create a new issue, referencing this one. Thank you for your understanding and ongoing support.

[github-actions]

Hi @christothes, we deeply appreciate your input into this project. Regrettably, this issue has remained inactive for over 2 years, leading us to the decision to close it. We've implemented this policy to maintain the relevance of our issue queue and facilitate easier navigation for new contributors. If you still believe this topic requires attention, please feel free to create a new issue, referencing this one. Thank you for your understanding and ongoing support.