Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: Transition to .NET Foundation #222

Open
christophwille opened this issue Jul 5, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Proposal: Transition to .NET Foundation #222

christophwille opened this issue Jul 5, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@christophwille
Copy link

I'd like to propose that this project joins the .NET Foundation and is transitioned to community stewardship. The reason for asking that is many out there still use this library and would like to see it gently advanced, like Microsoft.Data.SqlClient or .NET 6.0 - no major feature work is expected, just an active community that fixes the odd bug going forward.

As is, this repo is dead. In a bad way. By not telling anyone its status, not allowing a clear way forward (except the odd fork that itself dies off, just like https://www.nuget.org/packages/ElasticScaleCore.Client).

@vigouredelaruse
Copy link

a worthy suggestion given the timeseries datapoints pertinent to this repo

however i believe you may want to consult the link below and make a case to the provided email directly
https://opensource.microsoft.com/codeofconduct/faq/

as not your attourney i suggest

  • that the mitigation you suggest adds another bureaucracy with potentially debilitative decision execution times to the nominal critical path
  • that this client library is associated with closed source infrastructure whose owers retain freedom to make opaque and arbitrary decisions regarding the entire software stack and the associated infrastructure, and are evidently doing so now
  • the conduct of the repo's contributors may well be in line with the aforementioned arbitrary opacity

best regards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants