Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Platform Driver Development Framework (PDDF): 1) Changes to psu base class (1.0 APIs) to support PDDF CLI utils, 2) Adding fan_base class to support PDDF fan CLI utils (comments incorporated) #62

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 6, 2019

Conversation

FuzailBrcm
Copy link
Contributor

  • Adding changes to psu_base class to support PDDF PSU cli utility.
  • Added fan_base class to support PDDF FAN cli utility.

All these changes are w.r.t 1.0 APIs. These will be migrated to 2.0 APIs in future. Comments to
#57
are addressed in this PR.

…class (1.0 APIs) to support PDDF CLI utils, 2) Adding fan_base class to support PDDF fan CLI utils (comments incorporated)
def get_speed_rear(self, index):
"""
Retrieves the speed of a rear FAN in the tray in revolutions per minute defined
by 1-based index <index>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

my understanding is that although there could have multi fans(usually 2) in a tray, but each fan has its own tachometer, so these fans in the same tray should still be treated as separated fans, In my view, this function is not needed.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

While mentioning the platform inventory, one fan-tray is usually considered as one fan unit. ODM too, provide the APIs to retrieve 'rear-fan' speed. 'lm-sensors' (or sensors command) denotes rear fan of FAN tray 1 as fan11, rear fan of FAN tray 2 as fan22 etc.

Open Config model FAN related CLIs also provide the fan speed in term of front and rear speed.

Set speed FAN APIs also set speed of both the fans in a single call. Hence a separate API is provided for rear FAN speed.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

on some vendors platform, they do treat fans in the same tray as separated fans and hide the rear/front info from user, in this case, this function is not applicable.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Keboliu,
If some vendors treat 'rear' fans as separate, indexing them is left to discretion of the vendors. e.g Accton uses,
fan1 (front) --------- fan11 (rear)
fan2 (front) --------- fan12(rear) etc

Some other platform may use fan1 (tray1-front), fan2(tray1-rear), fan3 (tray2-front), fan4 (tray2-rear) etc.

If separate indexing is being used, vendors can use 'get_speed' API. If tray is numbered and fans inside a tray are mentioned as 'front' and 'rear' then let 'get_speed_rear' API be used. Since some vendors also use tray numbering, can't we keep both APIs?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am ok with keeping both APIs.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this function may require more thorough commenting to ensure vendors understand that get_speed_rear() is only to be implemented for the rear fan of a 2-fan tray.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added extra comment to mention the same.

"""
return 0

def get_fan_rpm(self, idx, fan_idx):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"get_fan_speed" ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since fan speed unit is RPM, this name is chosen for the API. I can change this to 'get_fan_speed' if you think that represents the objective better.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

if you look at the function names in fan_base, they are using 'speed', I would suggest using 'speed' for consistency.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure. I will update the PR

Retrieves the output power in micro watts of a power supply unit (PSU) defined
by 1-based index <idx>
:param idx: An integer, 1-based index of the PSU of which to query o/p power
:return: An integer, value of o/p power in micro Watts if PSU is good, else zero
Copy link
Collaborator

@keboliu keboliu Sep 16, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the return value should be a float? same comments for the above voltage, current get functions.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Correct. However, psu driver takes care of converting the float value into milli or micro unit depending upon the required granularity. The SysFS interface reads the converted values.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what's your decision on return values? Still in integer or change to float?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We have decided to go with integer values here with milli volts, amps etc granularity.

"""
return ""

def get_mfr_id(self, idx):
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you give an example string for this id? Not sure the difference between mfr_id and serial number.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

mfr_id is the 'Manufacturer's ID'. Either name or some abbreviation which denotes the manufacturer. e.g.

  1. On Delta platforms, PSU mfr_id is 'DELTA'
  2. On some Accton platforms, PSU mfr_id is '3Y POWER'
  3. On soem Quanta platforms, PSU mfr_id is 'ARTESYN'

@FuzailBrcm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Changes as per the feedback --- 824881f

Above is the change incorporating the feedbacks from keboliu.

@FuzailBrcm
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fk410167
Improving the comments section of get_speed_rear() API -------- ee58546

Added extra comment explaining the usage of get_speed_rear()

@FuzailBrcm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks keboliu for approving.

sonic-buildimage PR ( sonic-net/sonic-buildimage#3387 ) has dependency over this PR ( #62 ) and sonic-utilities PR ( sonic-net/sonic-utilities#624 ).

@lguohan lguohan merged commit 8f609ad into sonic-net:master Dec 6, 2019
lguohan pushed a commit to sonic-net/sonic-buildimage that referenced this pull request Dec 11, 2019
sonic-net/sonic-platform-common#71 [Bug fix] fix a syntax error which was introduced by last commit
sonic-net/sonic-platform-common#70 Fix EEPROM vendor extension TLV number counting issue
sonic-net/sonic-platform-common#62 Platform Driver Development Framework (PDDF): 1) Changes to psu base class (1.0 APIs) to support PDDF CLI utils, 2) Adding fan_base class to support PDDF fan CLI utils (comments incorporated)
sonic-net/sonic-platform-common#68 DeviceBase.get_name should raise NotImplementedError like other member
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants