-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 274
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
keep del when del-set produced #723
Open
inspurSDN
wants to merge
12
commits into
sonic-net:master
Choose a base branch
from
inspurSDN:patch-1
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
what I did: when del-set-sequence exist in consumer table, I keep the del event been execute even a set of the same key is already seen after the del. why I did: in the old code, the del is setting an key without fv, so if a set with fv after, it will only execute a set, so the multimap m_toSync can not seen the del event, sometimes the lost del may result errors if something is depending on the del event.
what I did: when del-set-sequence exist in consumer table, I keep the del event been execute even a set of the same key is already seen after the del. why I did: in the old code, the del is setting an key without fv, so if a set with fv after, it will only execute a set, so the multimap m_toSync can not seen the del event, sometimes the lost del may result errors if something is depending on the del event.
keep del when del-set-sequence exist, update the ut
added support for TEST(ConsumerStateTable, set_pop_del_set_pop_get)
added support for TEST(ConsumerStateTable, async_set_del_set)
add comments for insert a DEL
remove comments for test again
add comments for test again.
always failed for something different vstest cases, all not involved what I do, it is such a bad experience. |
only for test again
inspurSDN
changed the title
keep del when del-set-sequence exist
keep del when del-set produced
Dec 15, 2022
only for test again
just for retest
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
what I did:
when del-set-sequence exist in consumer table, I keep the del event been execute even a set of the same key is already seen after the del.
why I did:
in the old code, the del is setting an key without fv, so if a set with fv after, it will only execute a set, so the multimap m_toSync can not seen the del event, sometimes the lost del may result errors if something is depending on the del event.