You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for providing such an amazing tool for spatial transcriptome analysis. However, when running it, I am somewhat confused by the inconsistence between N_cells_per_location and the deconvolution result.
I was running an analysis on sample collected from mouse liver. I gave the hyperparameter as N_cells_per_location equal to 10, but the deconvolution results showed that some spots had as many as ~20 hepatocytes.
Is this result normal? Or should I adjust the parameters somehow?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This is normal and depends on the amount of technical variability in RNA detection across the slides. You can increase detection_alpha or use segmented nuclei counts with our new experimental branch #344 if getting absolute values is very important for project goals (such as comparing many samples).
Thank you for providing such an amazing tool for spatial transcriptome analysis. However, when running it, I am somewhat confused by the inconsistence between N_cells_per_location and the deconvolution result.
I was running an analysis on sample collected from mouse liver. I gave the hyperparameter as N_cells_per_location equal to 10, but the deconvolution results showed that some spots had as many as ~20 hepatocytes.
Is this result normal? Or should I adjust the parameters somehow?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: