You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've implemented some rules for MARC record sorting, but it would be good to have some test cases.
Things like
E1000 .A45 > E 101 .B34,
and so forth. The big questions come up with the arbitrary mixing of Cutter numbers, dates, and decimals.
For example, my reading of the use of table PR4a suggests that a translation of a Shakespeare play may have two sucessive Cutter numbers in a way that breaks the parser. But I'm not immediately sure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've implemented some rules for MARC record sorting, but it would be good to have some test cases.
Things like
E1000 .A45
>E 101 .B34
,and so forth. The big questions come up with the arbitrary mixing of Cutter numbers, dates, and decimals.
For example, my reading of the use of table PR4a suggests that a translation of a Shakespeare play may have two sucessive Cutter numbers in a way that breaks the parser. But I'm not immediately sure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: