You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently we just set a type, whereas structs allow naming the field with s.field(). It would be nice to have an equivalent e.field() on enum constructors. This would both make the Make Package Enum node nicer as it currently uses data object IDs (which are often ugly for easier parsing of API endpoints) to name the pins on a node, as well as the Break Scope node which currently only displays the name property (absent on package enums) and does not fall back to the ID like Make Package Enum does.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently we just set a type, whereas structs allow naming the field with s.field(). It would be nice to have an equivalent e.field() on enum constructors. This would both make the Make Package Enum node nicer as it currently uses data object IDs (which are often ugly for easier parsing of API endpoints) to name the pins on a node, as well as the Break Scope node which currently only displays the
name
property (absent on package enums) and does not fall back to the ID like Make Package Enum does.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: