You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for your great work!
I have tried to reproduce the results of PointGPT-L's part segmentation in paper, but find out there are some problems.
Cls.mIoU
Inst.mIoU
paper
84.8
86.6
reproduce
83.7
85.7
It seems that there is a consistent gap in the evaluation metrics. I conducted the experiments on a single NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU, with batch size 8, learning 0.0001. Other settings are set to their default values in the code.
Could you help me with the problem? Any insights would be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, Sorry to bother you. I have a question. When doing the few-shot learning on Modelnet40, the accuracy is produced by the training process or the test process? I have tried so many times to test the few-shot learning and the result is so bad. @jerryfeng2003
Hi, Sorry to bother you. I have a question. When doing the few-shot learning on Modelnet40, the accuracy is produced by the training process or the test process? I have tried so many times to test the few-shot learning and the result is so bad. @jerryfeng2003
I have replied to your questions in another issue.
Thank you for your great work!
I have tried to reproduce the results of PointGPT-L's part segmentation in paper, but find out there are some problems.
It seems that there is a consistent gap in the evaluation metrics. I conducted the experiments on a single NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU, with batch size 8, learning 0.0001. Other settings are set to their default values in the code.
Could you help me with the problem? Any insights would be greatly appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: