We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Just preserving @russfiedler's Slack comment before it disappears https://arccss.slack.com/archives/C9Q7Y1400/p1613975875009400
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Russ wrote:
I think I may have found the source of the tripole shear problem. Ocean velocity ( ssuo, ssvo) is supplied to CICE on the u grid but its halos are updated as if it was at the cell centre. https://github.com/COSIMA/cice5/blob/master/drivers/auscom/cpl_interface.F90#L662-L663 (the slope of the ocean is also misaligned). This means that the northern halo is treated as -u(M-m+1,N) rather than -u(M-m,N-1). Relative velocity is used in the elastoviscous solver amongst other things. I'm pretty sure it isn't regridded before this. Can anyone check? The call to start updating the halos is here https://github.com/COSIMA/cice5/blob/master/drivers/auscom/CICE_RunMod.F90#L180
and
On further investigation it doesn't look like velocities in the halos are used so it's probably ok. The calls should be fixed though to field_loc_NEcorner for the velocities https://github.com/COSIMA/cice5/blob/master/drivers/auscom/ice_constants.F90#L199-L206
Sorry, something went wrong.
This is the tripole shear bug Russ referred to: COSIMA/access-om2#86
No branches or pull requests
Just preserving @russfiedler's Slack comment before it disappears
https://arccss.slack.com/archives/C9Q7Y1400/p1613975875009400
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: