Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clusters visualization? #93

Closed
qchempku2017 opened this issue Oct 29, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #181
Closed

Clusters visualization? #93

qchempku2017 opened this issue Oct 29, 2020 · 1 comment · Fixed by #181
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@qchempku2017
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey just a small idea for user friendliness:

How about we add a method that visualizes clusters, so that users knows what it is on a projected structure plot? I think this might be very helpful when user wants to analyze short range orderings. They can just type like: some_orbit.visualize() and get a image right away, not having to match the indices of each atom in a cluster, and connect them manually.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Please describe the problem you are trying to solve.

Describe the solution you'd like
Please describe the desired behavior.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Please describe alternative solutions or features you have considered.

@qchempku2017 qchempku2017 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 29, 2020
@lbluque
Copy link
Collaborator

lbluque commented Oct 30, 2020

I think that could be a cool idea @qchempku2017! It would be worth discussing exactly how it can best be implemented without adding to much dependency bloat.

@lbluque lbluque mentioned this issue Apr 7, 2022
4 tasks
@lbluque lbluque linked a pull request Apr 7, 2022 that will close this issue
4 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants