Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CallbackPositionProperty #2597

Closed
speigg opened this issue Mar 23, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

CallbackPositionProperty #2597

speigg opened this issue Mar 23, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@speigg
Copy link
Contributor

speigg commented Mar 23, 2015

A CallbackPositionProperty with referenceFrame and getValueInReferenceFrame would be useful.

@hpinkos
Copy link
Contributor

hpinkos commented Dec 23, 2015

@speigg Sorry it took so long to respond to this
This is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure if it's something we would implement. Can you explain a little bit more about your motivation for wanting this?

@pjcozzi
Copy link
Contributor

pjcozzi commented Jun 14, 2017

Closing since there is no update in 1.5 years. Please reopen with more details if this is still of interest.

@pjcozzi pjcozzi closed this as completed Jun 14, 2017
@nsorin
Copy link

nsorin commented Jun 26, 2017

I second this, a CallbackPositionProperty would be a useful addition, and I don't understand why it doesn't exist already.
I am using a polyline with a PolylineDashMaterialProperty as material to link 2 entities whose position is determined by a non constant CallbackProperty. To reference the 2 entities' positions in the polyline, I have to use a PropertyArray instead of a PositionPropertyArray (because the latter needs a referenceFrame).
This somehow causes the dashes of the polyline to stretch in a strange way at some angles. This did not happen when I didn't need the callback and simply used a PositionPropertyArray.

Any chance this feature can be implemented in a future version ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants