You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 24, 2024. It is now read-only.
Issues of false positives aside, I think performance metrics representing the data we use these datasets for would be more appropriate than %links. e.g.:
centreline: % total VKT
HERE: % of weekday observations for a given month.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For centreline 80.8% of 2016 AADT is matched up to SharedStreets:
SELECT100.0*SUM(CASE WHEN ss.reference_id IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE aadt END) /SUM(aadt)
fromuoft_volume.aadt_finalLEFT joingis_shared_streets.centreline_matched ss ON centreline_id = geo_id::BIGINTand (case when direction ='Northbound'or direction ='Eastbound' then 1 else -1 end) = dir_bin
where yr=2016
70.75% when snapToIntersections=TRUE is used:
SELECT100.0*SUM(CASE WHEN ss.reference_id IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE aadt END) /SUM(aadt)
fromuoft_volume.aadt_finalLEFT joingis_shared_streets.centreline_snap ss ON centreline_id = geo_id::BIGINTand (case when direction ='Northbound'or direction ='Eastbound' then 1 else -1 end) = dir_bin
where yr=2016
For HERE 95.7% of weekday observations for 201903 when snaptointersection=TRUE is used:
SELECT100.0*SUM(CASE WHEN ss.reference_id IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END) /count(1)
fromhere.ta_201903LEFT joingis_shared_streets.here_matched_snap ss using (link_dir)
where date_part('isodow'::text, tx) <6::double precision
For HERE 98.2% of weekday observation for 201903 when snaptoinetsection=FALSE is used:
SELECT100.0*SUM(CASE WHEN ss.reference_id IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END) /count(1)
fromhere.ta_201903LEFT joingis_shared_streets.here_matched_t6 ss using (link_dir)
where date_part('isodow'::text, tx) <6::double precision
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Issues of false positives aside, I think performance metrics representing the data we use these datasets for would be more appropriate than %links. e.g.:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: