Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Motion between consecutive frames #25

Closed
guyrose3 opened this issue Jul 30, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Motion between consecutive frames #25

guyrose3 opened this issue Jul 30, 2018 · 1 comment

Comments

@guyrose3
Copy link

In the readme you state enough motion is guaranteed between following frames.
I wonder how that affects the performance when the vehicle is static.
Can you elaborate on that design decision?
is it convergence issues?

Thanks,
Guy

@ClementPinard
Copy link
Owner

Hi, the motion between frames is important because otherwise the photometric error is 0 for any kind of depth as long as movement is 0. As a consequence, if you have too many static frames, you can end up having a pose estimator always outputting identity pose, and your depth will diverge.

This is just theoritical, and you can test on a dataset with static frames but I think KITTI has too many of them, and they are even not static scenes (with moving objects). Why the author discarded the static frames in the first place is probably because he got better resuts without than with.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants