We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I just noticed that the Bayesian score on the general report does not match what is seen in Scout when you have used evidence of benign impact.
I have classified a variant in mtDNA in case 24405 as Likely benign with Bayesian score: https://scout.scilifelab.se/evaluations/676574ee6c9e5f5b5140724d
On the general report the variant gets classified as a cold VUS:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I just noticed that the Bayesian score on the general report does not match what is seen in Scout when you have used evidence of benign impact.
I have classified a variant in mtDNA in case 24405 as Likely benign with Bayesian score:
https://scout.scilifelab.se/evaluations/676574ee6c9e5f5b5140724d
On the general report the variant gets classified as a cold VUS:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: