chore: Remove SASS in favour of vanilla CSS #109
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- SASS was actually making it harder to organise our styles - build is quicker without CSS preprocessing
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 4.0.0 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The vanilla CSS may be a little more verbose, but it allows more flexibility in organising our styles than nested SASS. Additionally, the build is a touch quicker without CSS preprocessing, and watch mode is simpler as we no longer need chokidar.
It's always nice to remove dependencies: fewer things to keep up to date = 🥳
(that being said, I've added another rollup plugin for css minifying 🤫)