New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

BUG: definition for 'has affiliate' relation matches its inverse exactly #557

Open

jonathanvajda opened this issue Nov 21, 2024 · 1 comment

jonathanvajda commented Nov 21, 2024 •

edited

Loading

Two relations have the same definition.

https://www.commoncoreontologies.org/ont00001939 ("is affiliated with")
https://www.commoncoreontologies.org/ont00001977 ("has affiliate")

skos:definition "x is_affiliated_with y iff x and y are instances of Agent, such that they have any kind of social or business relationship."@en ;

Change request: replace the left side of the biconditional with the rdfs:label for "has affiliate" (ont*1977).

Alternatively: deprecate "has affiliate" and the inverseOf axiom, and make the relation symmetric and add a skos:altLabel "has affiliate".

Contributor

johnbeve commented Nov 21, 2024

On the radar; QC picked it up (along with a few other issues) in earlier builds (https://github.com/CommonCoreOntology/CommonCoreOntologies/actions/runs/11657725502/job/32455719048#step:5:150).

Leaving this open to address them in batch; thanks @jonathanvajda

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment