-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Topic lists should not be entered as lists of competencies #4
Comments
I think what we may end up ultimately needing to do is:
I'm not sure if or how doing the above would relate to or be reliant on some kind of implementation of concept schemes/concepts in the registry/CASS - if we can do that as a separate phase unrelated to the above, it would make things easier. |
+1 for a sandbox CASS to ingest the legacy competency data and follow through as you suggest, Nate. I've done as thorough an analysis as I can with Michael's first iteration of output. Perhaps some time can be spent on tomorrow's (Tuesday, Feb. 6) regular call would put us in a position to export to such a sandbox. |
We will need to ensure that we can get the (cleaned up) data back out after dealing with it through the CASS interface. So we'll either need a clean/empty sandbox environment to load the data into initially (preferable), or we'll need a means (probably via CTID) to keep track of everything we put in so we can have a way to pull it back out afterwards. I'm open to suggestions. Since we'll likely be creating nodes when we break things out (i.e., from bulleted lists in text), my guess is that it will be far more reliable to start with an empty bucket, load the data, then export the entire new dataset once our edits are complete. |
@jkitchensSIUC, @siuc-nate, @cwd-mparsons and Bob Sheets (no github account?), the CASS implementation provides for expressing a:
We currently have in the legacy competency framework data to be ingested into CASS, topic lists defined as competencies. This is very bad because we are corrupting the long-term utility of the competency data by calling things competencies that simply aren't. A competency will always frame what a person should know or be able to do. So, for example, the topic "Logistics Environment" defines no competencies since is says nothing about what someone will need to be know or be able to do in the context of "Logistics Environment".
Here is an example of topic lists (topicsCovered) for the MSSC Certified Logistic Technician (CLT) certification that has two assessments, each with a list of topics covered in the assessment:
Certification
Assessment 1
Topics Covered
Assessment 2
Topics Covered
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: